loading...
Canwest News Service
THE GENIAL GENE
BY JOAN ROUGHGARDEN
U of California Press, 272 pages ($29.95)
– - -
Released to coincide with the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Joan Roughgarden's book, The Genial Gene, lays the foundation for an alternative interpretation of Darwinian evolution. Roughgarden, a biology professor at California's Stanford University, challenges the commonly accepted idea that evolution is driven by cutthroat competition between individuals and provides evidence for a model for natural selection that incorporates cooperation as a driving force to explain animal courting, mate selection and offspring-rearing behaviours.
Early in the book, she summarizes the every-man-for-himself interpretation of evolution that most of us are familiar with and asks whether this prevailing view — known as the sexual selection theory — is true. As she presents an abundance of examples drawn from studies conducted on many species, it becomes clear there are some observations that can't be accounted for by the sexual selection theory.
Certainly, all theories have limitations, but when a careful analysis shows that cases considered exceptions to the rule are much more prevalent than previously thought, then it is time to question whether the norm needs to be redefined.
What makes this book remarkably innovative is that the author doesn't view the inability of the sexual selection theory to account for certain observations as limitations, which are inherent to all theories, but as an indicator that the sexual-selection world view is fundamentally flawed. Therefore, she doesn't attempt to extend the currently established model to address the limitations she finds, but instead proposes her own theory: the social selection theory.
In the social selection theory, co-operation is key to survival, not because it is a means to achieving individual ends but because it is in the best interest of individuals to act in a way that is beneficial not only for them but also for the group. (This is the same idea, developed by John Nash, that revolutionized game theory and earned him a Nobel Prize, as shown in the movie A Beautiful Mind.)
Using both empirical data and numerous scenarios to compare
loading...
Does this idea challenge Richard Dawkins selfish gene theory?
Please continue discussion on the forum: link